Just into reading Richard Kearney's newest book "Anatheism". His thesis seems to be that one must go the whole way into "atheism" before one can return to "G*d". However that may be for anyone else, his analysis of biblical (including the Qu'ran) symbols and metaphors is 'enlightening'. Pick it up if you can - it has a lot of big and obscure words, but that's what dictionaries are for!


 


Comments

David Galston
11/13/2012 10:11am

Thanks, Bruce, for your comment. I've been calling this "post-atheism," but maybe anatheism is a better term (reminds me of Anabaptist, though!).

Reply
Bruce Turton
11/13/2012 12:10pm

Problem is that this is a quest to regain some form of theism, which is always, to my mind, metaphysical, dualistic, and too much of Plato's "cave". Much prefer David's approach in "Embracing the Human Jesus", which does not require any theism! Even "post-theism" seems to me to have a small space left for the "cave" and the dualism that allows us to avoid reality with all its messiness, cruelty, love, fun, pain, joy.

Reply
11/14/2012 7:32am

Bruce, thanks for recommending Kearney's "Anatheism". Over the past 2 or 3 months I've been reading, mostly an eclectic assortment of sociological and psychological perspectives, about 'the new and different, non-theistic faith' (my words: for lack of a better description) that, apparently, is sweeping across a thoroughly secularized Europe. After reading your post on Snow Blog, I checked out some online reviews of "Anatheism". With Kearney's philosophical approach to this European phenomenon, it seems a good fit with my recent reading material. So I ordered the book. In anticipation of it's arrival, and as per your warning, I've also dusted off my dictionary <grin>. I'm also looking forward to spending some of my post-retirement hours reflecting on what Kearney has to say about the 'G*d problem', especially in relation to the works of Gordon Kaufman, Don Cupitt, Lloyd Geering and, more recently, David Galston's "Embracing the Human Jesus".

Reply
Bruce Turton
11/15/2012 3:58pm

I am thinking of coupling David's new book (which I must read again) with studies in parables - Herzog's "Parables as Subversive Speech" and the revisions in his 2000 book, Crossan, Schotroff, B.B. Scott, and others (once I get the books unpacked!). It would seem to me that the "wisdom" tradition needs to be expanded into the troubled political world of the "prophetic". This may be my own desire to recover the "prophetic" more explicitly into the Jesus Seminar's penchant for "wisdom". But I am just a mortal and also a political junkie!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply